We grant the two unopposed requests for judicial notice and the unopposed portions of the partially opposed request for judicial notice. This request for judicial notice is unopposed. Fourth, the City requests judicial notice of an ordinance. CERF partially opposes this request for judicial notice.
WILLIAM S DATO PARTY TRIAL
Third, the City and LJCFF request judicial notice of documents relating to an ordinance amendment, a stipulation to stay trial court proceedings and an e-mail communication. The City and LJCFF oppose portions of this request for judicial notice. Second, CERF requests judicial notice of documents relating to a temporary restraining order, permits, stipulation to stay trial court proceedings and portions of an administrative record. First, the City and LJCFF request judicial notice of documents relating to ordinance amendments, permits and a 2011 fireworks display. There are four pending requests for judicial notice. CERF, the City and LJCFF (the parties) have filed a joint application and stipulation to vacate judgments and remand actions to the superior court for dismissal with prejudice. 37-2010-00095062-CU-TT-CTL, real party in interest La Jolla Community Fireworks Foundation, Inc. In all three cases, the trial courts ruled in favor of CERF and the City appealed.
WILLIAM S DATO PARTY CODE
37-2011-00092008-CU-TT-CTL) and (3) the City violated the CEQA in November 2011 when it further amended the San Diego Municipal Code (No. 37-2010-00095062-CU-TT-CTL) (2) the City violated the CEQA in May 2011 when it made related amendments to the San Diego Municipal Code (No.
(CERF) alleged that (1) defendant and appellant the City of San Diego (the City) violated the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) by permitting the 2010 La Jolla Cove Fireworks Show without first performing an environmental review (No. In these three consolidated cases, plaintiff and respondent Coastal Environmental Rights Foundation, Inc. Gonzalez and Livia Borak for Plaintiff and Respondent. Everett for Defendant and Appellant and Real Party in Interest and Appellant. Worley, Assistant City Attorney, Glenn Spitzer, Deputy City Attorney Latham & Watkins, Robert M. This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b).
0 kommentar(er)
